Posts Tagged Landlords

EXECUTION OF WRIT: Part 1 – The Basics

I have noticed a trend in the last several months of more and more tenants refusing to leave a landlord’s rental property even after the landlord has obtained a judgment of eviction against the tenant and been issued a Writ of Restitution (“writ”).  As a result of this trend more and more landlords are being forced to go through the process of having the writ executed.  The execution of the writ is the process whereby the Sheriff actually removes the non-vacating tenant and returns possession of the property to the landlord.

Background Information:

Most eviction lawsuits have 3 causes of action or claims.  The first cause of action is for return of the rental property.  This is often referred to as the “eviction” portion and in Milwaukee County it is called the “1st cause of action.”  The 2nd and 3rd causes of action have to do with the money that the tenant might owe the landlord.  The 2nd cause refers to the past due rent that may be owed and the 3rd cause refers to any claims for physical damages to the unit and/or holdover damages.  Together the 2nd and 3rd causes of action are often referred to as the “money claims.”

This post will focus on the 1st cause of action generally, and specifically, on what a landlord must do s/he has been granted a judgment of eviction and received a writ of restitution but the tenant continues to reside in the unit. 

A landlord typically obtains a judgment of eviction (and the ensuing writ) in one of three ways.  First, the tenant fails to show for court and the landlord is granted a default judgment.  Second, the tenant appears in court and contests the eviction thus necessitating an eviction trial before a judge.  Assuming the landlord proves his/her case, the landlord obtains a judgment of eviction and is issued a writ.  Third, the tenant appears in court and admits that they are in breach of the lease and the court commissioner or judge grants a judgment of eviction against the tenant based on his/her admission and issues a writ.

Many landlords mistakenly believe that after they obtain a judgment of eviction and a writ that they can then change the locks and toss out the tenants personal property if the tenant fails to leave.  DO NOT DO THIS.  If the tenant fails to vacate the unit, even after there has been a judgment and a writ issued, the only legal way to remove the tenant is to hire the Sheriff and to have the writ executed (sec. 799.45, Wis. Stats.)  If a landlord attempts to illegally evict a tenant (also referred to as a ”self-help” eviction) th elandlord is openeing himself/herself up to either civil or criminal liability, or both.  The tenant can sue the landlord that engaged in a self-help eviction for double damages and attorney fees.  While it may seem “unfair” to require the landlord to expend more time and money after s/he has already obtained a judgment of eviction against a non paying tenant, that is what the law requires.

The Writ of Restitution:

Along with obtaining a judgement of eviction comes the issuance of a Writ of Restitution (writ).  A writ is a document that orders the Sheriff to evict the tenant and anyone else that has occupancy of the rental unit.  The writ also contains additional information that will assist the Sheriff in executing the writ, such as the name and address and phone number of the landlord, the landlord’s attorney, and the defendant/tenant.

In Milwaukee County the court does not give you a writ.  Instead the court gives you an Authorization for Writ.  The landlord must then take that Authorization to the Clerk of Courts and pay $5 in order to obtain the actual writ.  The landlord must then complete the writ and tender it to the Sheriff. 

Each county handles the distribution of the writ differently.  In Waukesha County (at least last time I was there) a landlord is required to return to court the following day to obtain the writ and pay the fee.  The Clerk completes the writ for you in Waukesha.  In Racine County, a landlord should pick up a blank writ from the Clerk of Courts before court, complete all the requested information on the writ, and then present it to the judge when the case is called and the judge will sign the writ.  No fee is required in Racine County.  In Kenosha County, a landlord must go to the Clerk of Courts after court and pay $5 and the Clerk will then complete the writ for you and hand it to you.  It is advisable to talk to the Clerk of Courts in whatever county you own rental property about the process of obtaining the writ before you appear in court.

A writ is only valid for 30 days.  If a landlord does not tender the writ to the Sheriff within the 30 day period the writ will expire and the landlord will need to start the entire eviction process over again in order to remove a tenant that is still residing in the property.  Yep, you heard me correctly.  If the landlord lets the writ expire, the landlord will need to serve the tenant with a new notice, purchase a new summons and have it filed and served on the tenant, appear in court again etc. etc.  Do not let the writ expire!  New landlords (or landlords with no previous eviction experience) should not let a tenant dupe them into not filing the writ with the Sheriff within the 30 day period.  Tenants may tell you that they just need 10 more days, and then another 5 days, and then 3 more days and they will be out, etc. etc.  If all those extra days add up to 30 – the landlord has only himself/herself to blame. 

Executing The Writ:

In Milwaukee County, only the Sheriff can legally execute the writ.  Before the Sheriff will do this however the landlord must hire a moving company.  The landlord must obtain a Letter of Authority from a licensed and bonded moving company and in return the landlord will have to shell out a refundable deposit of approximately $350 to the movers.

Once the landlord has engaged the services of a moving company the landlord should go to the Sheriff’s Department for Milwaukee County and bring along the following items:

1.  The Authorization for Writ

2.  The fully completed Writ of Restitution

3.  $130 deposit to give to the Sheriff

4.  A set of keys to the unit to give to the Sheriff.

By law, once the writ has been delivered to the Sheriff, the Sheriff must execute the writ within the next 10 days (sec. 799.45(5), Wis. Stats.)  Due to the large amount of evictions in Milwaukee, it typically takes the Sheriff the full 10 days.  Oftentimes the Milwaukee County Sheriff will mail the tenant a 24 hour notice the day before the planned eviction to give them one last chance to leave on his/her own.  This notice is not legally required and so it is irrelevant if the Sheriff does not do it for every eviction.  Think of it as a courtesy.

If the tenant still has personal property in the rental unit when the Sheriff arrives to execute the writ ,the Sheriff will then determine what of the tenant’s personal property should be stored by the moving company and what property is considered to have no value and can be disposed of.  After the tenant’s personal property has been dealt with, and if the tenant is still residing in the property, the Sheriff will direct the tenant — and any others residing in the unit — out of the unit and insure that the unit is secure.  If the tenant refuses to leave the unit, s/he will be arrested for Disorderly Conduct.  It should be noted that the Sheriff can make the tenant leave the specific rental unit but cannot make the tenant leave the apartment building or complex.  If the tenant refuses to leave the building then the landlord must call the police.

It is helpful if the landlord or his agent can be present during the eviction to answer any questions that the Sheriff or moving company may have.  I have heard of one instance where a tenant told the Sheriff that the refirgerator and stove in the unit were purchased by the tenant and were his.  This was not the truth.  The landlord was not present during the eviction however to refute the tenant (or to produce the rental agreement to the Sheriff which would have shown that the landord supplied a refrigerator and stove along with the rental) and the appliances were taken off to storage.  The landlord had a difficult time retrieving his property and had to pay a storage fee to get the appliances back.

In smaller counties — those with a population of less than 500,000 – a landlord is allowed to remove, store, and dispose of a tenant’s property himself/herself and the only role that the Sheriff performs is to supervise the landlord.  I have not had any experience with this type of eviction, so I can not provide yu with any more information other than this option is legally available to landlords who own rental property outside of Milwaukee County.

Next week I will blog on some of the smaller details involved with executing a writ that will assist you in the process.

Tags: , ,

BED BUGS: Everything That You Wanted To Know . . . and More

If you have not heard — bed bugs are making a comeback.  Bed bugs are wreaking havoc on hotels, apartment complexes, and anywhere else where people congregate.  I have even been told that 75% of all of the hotels in Las Vegas are infested with bed bugs – I don’t know if that is true or not – but with the influx of people entering and exiting that city daily, it would not surprise me, since bed bugs are the ultimate hitchhiker.  Unlike roaches or other varmits, bed bugs are attracted to people – not dirty living conditions, so you can have a perfectly clean apartment that still may be infested with bed bugs.  In the past very strong chemicals (DDT) kept the bed bug population at bay, but with many pesticides now outlawed, bed bugs have made a comeback, much to the dismay of the rental community.

The pesky bed bug has appeared at more than a few of my client’s rental complexes and trsut me when I tell you they are expensive and difficult to indicate.  The best way to eliminate bed bugs is to prevent them from even showing up in the first place.  But prevention is difficult since they hitch rides on furniture, clothing and other personal belongings.

Whereas, bed bugs used to be the specialty of exterminators who would spray chemicals around the infested rooms to kill them and their eggs, there are now other contractors that have entered the field.  There are bed bug sniffing dogs that can be rented to sniff around your rental unit and alert you to any possible infestation and other companies that are killing bed bugs by different means then chemicals – such as heat treatment.

Because of the huge increase of bed bugs being found in rental housing lately, the AASEW’s June membership meeting included a presentation on this “itchy” subject by AASEW business member, Giertsen Company of Wisconsin.  Giertsen Co. is primarily a remediation company (wind, water and fire damage) however they have learned that the heating equipmen that is used to dry out a water damages property also can be used to kill the pesky bed bug. 

Below is the PowerPoint presentation that Patrick Meyer of Giertsen Co. shared with the AASEW on June 21, 2010.

The old saying that my parents would tell me prior to going to bed when I was a kid — “Don’t let the bed bugs bite” — has a whole new context for me after viewing this presentation.

Tags: , , , ,

Compiling a List of “Bad” Tenants – a/k/a “Blacklisting” – Can Cause A Landlord A World of Hurt

Every so often it is suggested that landlords begin compiling a list of bad tenants to share with one another.  This topic often arises after a landlord has been “burned” by a bad tenant that skipped out on a lease owing rent, caused severe damage to the landlord’s rental property, or any number of other breaches of their rental agreement.  It is argued that such a list could prevent other landlords from renting to the same “bad” tenant and hopefully avoid being burned as well.  While this seems like a great idea on its face, blacklising tenants is full of legal ramifications.

This issue came up last week on the “AASEW Listserv”  (a Yahoo groups community that includes 800+ landlords and property managers primarily located in the SE Wisconsin area that discuss all things rental).  The list serv is expertly moderated by Tim Ballering.  If you are not a member of this list serv (and you are invovled in the rental property industry) then you should definitely join by sending an email to ApartmentAssoc-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

Below is the question posed by a landlord and the moderator’s response.

QUESTION: 

Does our group have a policy about sharing names of problem tenants?  I am sure some landlords would love to know who is a problem and others may feel differently about that.

ANSWER: 

Short Version:   We do not permit it.

Long Version (why we do not permit something that would be a great tool for all of us):

Posting deadbeats names to a list violates the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

“Blacklists” are quite illegal and potentially costly to those involved with maintaining the list or those sharing the names that end up on the list.  If you keep a list of who has been naughtly or nice, that list must contain both good and bad information about the tenant.  Additionally, those named tenants must have the ability to review and challenge the validity of their inclusion.  Finally, all provisions of the Fair Credit Reporting Act must be complied with that any other credit bureau must adhere to. 

Fines can be as large as $50,000 per offense plus the poosibility of being sued civilly.

The pertinent rules under the FDCPA are:

§ 805. Communication in connection with debt collection 
 
. . .
 
(b) COMMUNICATION WITH THIRD PARTIES. Except as provided in section 804, without the prior consent of the consumer given directly to the debt collector, or the express permission of a court of competent jurisdiction, or as reasonably necessary to effectuate a postjudgment judicial remedy, a debt collector may not communicate, in connection with the collection of any debt, with any person other than a consumer, his attorney, a consumer reporting agency if otherwise permitted by law, the creditor, the attorney of the creditor, or the attorney of the debt collector.
 
§ 806. Harassment or abuse 
 
 A debt collector may not engage in any conduct the natural consequence of which is to harass, oppress, or abuse any person in connection with the collection of a debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:
 
. . .
 
(3) The publication of a list of consumers who allegedly refuse to pay debts, except to a consumer reporting agency or to persons meeting the requirements of section 603(f) or 604(3)
 
  
__________________________
 
So as helpful as a listing of bad tenants might appear on its face, it is illegal.  The best way to avoid renting to problem tenants legally is to properly screen all rental applicants – to read more about this please see my April 17th post and refer to these helpful internet sites.
 
 

Tags: , ,

New Law Limits Landlords From Pursuing A Deceased Tenant’s Estate

Governor Doyle recently signed into law 2009 WI Act 323 which creates a new section to Chapter 704 of the Wisconsin Statutes regarding Landlord-Tenant Law.

The new section 704.165, Wis. Stats., is entitled “Termination of Tenancy at Death of Tenant”

Below is a summary of the new law:

1.     If a residential tenant dies and had a term lease, his/her tenancy will be terminated  60 days after the landlord learns of the death or the expiration of the rental term, whichever occurs first.

2.     If a residential tenant dies and was under a periodic tenancy (i.e. month to month) then the tenancy will terminate 60 days after the landlord  becomes aware of the death.  If the deceased tenant’s estate provides proper notice to terminate the tenancy under sec. 704.19, Wis. Stats. then the tenancy may be terminated even earlier as outlined in 704.19, Wis. Stats.

3.     Neither the deceased residential tenant nor his/her estate will be liable for any rent after the tenancy is terminated.

4.     The landlord must still attempt to mitigate the deceased tenant’s damages by making attempts to re-rent the unit before the tenancy terminates.

5.     Nothing in this new section relieves another adult tenant who resides at the rental property (and who did not die) from their obligations under the rental agreement or otherwise.

6.     A landlord may not contact or otherwise communicate with a member of the deceased tenant’s family in an attempt to obtain rent for which the family member has no liability.

7.     This new law first applies to tenancies and rental agreements that are entered into on or after May 12, 2010.

Tags: , ,

Latest EPA Proposed Changes to “Renovate Right” Rules — Deadline to Provide Feedback July 6th

ALERT! The latest EPA proposal will require dust sampling and lab testing clearance on many small jobs.  The EPA estimates $160 per room in testing cost.  In WI testing can only be done by state certified risk assessors and the cost is about $240 per room.  So a  repair to a damaged door jamb could cost ten times as much as it does today, and many times more than that if you were a do it yourselfer.

From the Federal Register (Link Below) #2 and #4 are the “gotchas.”

Dust wipe testing must be performed after all renovations involving:

     -  Use of a heat gun at temperatures below 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit

     -  Removal or replacement of window or door frames

     -  Scraping 60 ft [2] or more of painted surfaces

     -  Removing more than 40 ft [2] of trim, molding, cabinets, or other fixtures.

Link to the proposed rule in the Federal Register

The 60 day comment period ends July 6th, 2010

Read the comments submitted by the Apartment Association of Southeastern WI and links to the EPA comment page at:

http://www.renovatorrules.com/

Make sure you post some feedback.  This is one of the biggest changes to affect our industry and these changes are huge and will put many contractors (and landlords) out of business.  Fines for violating these new laws can be as much as $32,500 per each violation.

Tags: , ,