Posts Tagged ATCP 134

LATE FEES – PART 1: WHAT AMOUNT CAN YOU CHARGE?

Many of my clients ask me what amount they should charge a tenant who is late in paying rent. Many also wonder if there is a maximum amount beyond which they would not be allowed to charge as a late fee.

The only legal guidance we have as to what amount is acceptable as a late fee is the case of Three & One Co. v. Geilfuss, 178 Wis.2d 400, 504 N.W. 2d 393 (Ct. App. 1993). This 1993 Court of Appeal decision is not even specifically about the issue of late fees but rather addresses the issue of “waste” (when a tenant intentionally damages the rental property) and what amount of damages a landlord may recover against a tenant that commits waste on the landlord’s property. Nonetheless the Court in Geilfuss does state in its opinion that the late fee of $50 per month charged by the landlord was properly assessed against the tenant. Thus, we as landlords know that at least the Wisconsin Court of Appeals has upheld a late fee of $50 per month.

There is no other guidance in Wisconsin law as to the amount of late fee that is acceptable. No Wisconsin Statute addresses the issue nor does any administrative rule in Chapter ATCP 134 of the Wisconsin Administrative Code.

As such, a landlord should be able to charge a late fee of any amount as long as it is reasonable. Legally, a landlord should also be allowed to charge a daily late fee as well if they so choose. For those of you who choose to charge a daily late fee you should be aware the Model Lease for Subsidized Programs (which is drafted by HUD) specifically allow a landlord renting subsidized property to charge a late fee of $5 on the 6th day of the month and to charge $1 per day late fee each day thereafter for that month until the rent is paid.

On a practical level however – at least in Milwaukee County – there are some restrictions to the amount of the late fee that a landlord may charge. Milwaukee County has an unwritten rule that it does not allow daily late fees to be charged. I have had both court commissioners and judges in Milwaukee County eviction court toss out daily late fees that I have tried to obtain for my clients. The reason that I was provided is that daily late fees are “not fair.”

I have even had a past court commissioner in Milwaukee County (several years ago) tell me that he would not allow my client to collect a monthly late fee of $50 as he thought that was “unconscionable.” When I provided the commissioner with a copy of the Geilfuss case mentioned above where the Court of Appeals held that a $50 late fee was appropriate, the commissioner relented.

I have handled evictions and the associated damages claims in Dane County, Waukesha County, Kenosha County, Racine County, Aizoaceae County, Washington County, and a county or two county way up north that I can no longer recall – in all of these counties I have never had the court prevent me from obtaining a late fee for my client, regardless of the amount, as long as the late fee was clearly specified in the rental agreement as is required in the Wisconsin Administrative Code, ACP 134.09(8).

So as the law currently stands you should be able to charge any amount for a late fee that you wish, including daily late fees, if you are so inclined. However if you want to have actual legal support for the amount of the late fee you are charging then you may want to cap your late fees at $50 per month and carry a copy of the Geilfuss decision with you when you go to small claims court at least in Milwaukee County).

Please be aware however that individual municipalities can create ordinances regarding late fees that might be more restrictive than the state law.  For example the City of Madison’s local ordinances which you can review here prevent a landlord from charging a late fee that is more than 5% of the month rent.

A note of caution for Milwaukee County landlords – do not place the late fee amount in your 5 day notice or you might have your eviction case dismissed. See my prior post on this topic here.

Please share with me your experience with what amount of late fees you charge your tenants and if you have had any problems with the courts doing so.

Tags: ,

ATCP 134 RULES ON CREDIT CHECK/REPORT FEES

 

ATCP 134 contains specific rules regarding when and how a landlord can charge a rental applicant for the cost of their credit report.   As background, ATCP 134 is the chapter of the Administrative Code of Wisconsin that sets forth 21 requirements that Landlords must follow or else risk getting sued for double damages and attorney’s fees by the applicant or tenant.

The applicable portion of the rules regarding credit checks is located at ATCP 134.05(4). This section says that:

1. A landlord may charge a rental applicant the actual cost of their credit check up to $20.

- So if the actual cost to the landlord to order the report is only $10 then the landlord can only require the applicant to pay $10.

2. In order to charge the applicant the credit report fee the landlord must obtain the report from a consumer reporting agency that compiles and maintains files ona nationwide basis.

- So a landlord can only charge the applicant the fee if s/he is obtaining the credit report from one of the “Big 3″ (Experion, Equifax, or Trans Union)

- Thus a landlord cannot charge the tenant for the cost of the report if they are obtained from a local or regional consumer information dateabase, credit brokers, credit resellers etc.

3. The Landlord must notify the applicant of the cost before ordering the report.

4. The landlord must provide a copy of the credit report to the applicant if the applicant is paying for the report.

5. The landlord cannot charge the applicant for the cost of the credit report if the applicant provides the landlord with a copy of his/her credit report (obtained from one of the “Big 3″) that is less than 30 days old.

- If you are faced with this situation, I would strongly advise the landlord to still order a nmore recent report at their own expense to insure that the report provided by the tenant has not been modified.

Tags: ,

ATCP 134 – RESIDENTIAL RENTAL PRACTICES

If you are a landlord are you familiar with ATCP 134?  If not, you definitely need to be.  ATCP 134 is a chapter of the Wisconsin Administrative Code that applies to residential rental practices.  While these rules were updated in 1998 many well-intentioned landlords are still unfamiliar with their provisions and the rather extreme consequences that may result if you fail to abide by them.

The most overlooked – and the most litigated – rule is ATCP 134.06 (2) which pertains to the return of a tenant’s security deposit.  This rule states that a landlord shall return a tenant’s security deposit to that tenant within 21 days after the tenant surrenders the premises to the landlord.  This applies whenever the tenant leaves your unit whether that be at the end of the rental period or as the result of being evicted.

If the tenant has damaged the premises or owes back rent such amounts can be deducted from the tenant’s security deposit however the 21-day letter must still be sent to the tenant showing the itemized deductions that were taken form their security deposit.  The security deposit and/or 21-day letter must be sent to the tenant’s forwarding address or if that was not provided then to the tenants last known address.

The consequences to the landlord who fails to follow the above rules are severe.  Together, ATCP 134 and the Wisconsin Statutes, allow a tenant to sue a landlord who fails to return the security deposit or mail the 21-day letter to the tenant within the 21 day time period, for double the amount of the security deposit, together with the costs of the lawsuit and the tenant’s reasonable attorney’s fees. Yes, that is correct, that same tenant that you were forced to evict for failing  to pay their rent or for disturbing their neighbors by playing their music too loud, can now come back and sue his/her landlord.  Adding insult to injury, besides receiving a damages judgment against you, the landlord, you will also be stuck having to pay the fees of the lawyer who was hired by your ex-tenant to sue you.

If you are a landlord and are unaware of the above residential practice rule or are unfamiliar with ATCP 134 in general, I urge you to become knowledgable before you become mired in such a situation.

Tags: