<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tristan&#039;s Landlord - Tenant Law Blog &#187; ATCP 134</title>
	<atom:link href="http://petriestocking.com/blog/category/atcp-134/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog</link>
	<description>Tristan&#039;s Landlord - Tenant Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 22:35:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Joint Legislative Council Gives Clarification To Wisconsin&#8217;s New Landlord&#8217;s Omnibus Law</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/04/27/joint-legislative-council-gives-clarification-to-wisconsins-new-landlords-omnibus-law/</link>
		<comments>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/04/27/joint-legislative-council-gives-clarification-to-wisconsins-new-landlords-omnibus-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 00:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AASEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Act 143 (Landlord's Omnibus Law)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATCP 134]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord-Tenant Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord's Omnibus Law. Act 134]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin Joint Legislative COuncil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=3765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You will recall from my earlier post that I had some concerns about the new Landlord&#8217;s Omnibus Law (Act 134).  One of my main concerns was that it was unclear from the wording of Act 143 whether or not a violation of chapter 704 would give rise to a claim by a tenant that would [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/04/27/joint-legislative-council-gives-clarification-to-wisconsins-new-landlords-omnibus-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Wisconsin Act 143 (Landlord Omnibus Law) Also Applies To Commercial Landlord-Tenant Law</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/03/29/2011-wisconsin-act-143-landlord-omnibus-law-also-applies-to-commercial-landlord-tenant-law/</link>
		<comments>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/03/29/2011-wisconsin-act-143-landlord-omnibus-law-also-applies-to-commercial-landlord-tenant-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Act 143 (Landlord's Omnibus Law)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATCP 134]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney's Fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial L-T Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holdover Damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord Liability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Deposit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 Wisconsin Act 143]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commercial Landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerical Tenancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord Omnibus Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security Deposits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=3698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While this blog primarily focuses on residential landlord-tenant law, on occasion I also touch on issues applicable to commercial landlord-tenant law.  This is one such instance. Commercial landlord-tenant is more straightforward than residential in my opinion because commercial tenancies are less regulated than residential.  Typically what a commercial landlord and tenant agreed to and placed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/03/29/2011-wisconsin-act-143-landlord-omnibus-law-also-applies-to-commercial-landlord-tenant-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Landlord&#8217;s Omnibus Bill Signed Into Law &#8211; Read It Now</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/03/23/landlords-omnibus-bill-signed-into-law-read-it-now/</link>
		<comments>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/03/23/landlords-omnibus-bill-signed-into-law-read-it-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 18:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AASEW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Act 143 (Landlord's Omnibus Law)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATCP 134]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=3650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Governor Walker did sign the Landlord&#8217;s Omnibus Bill into law. I appreciate the effort of everyone that called the Governor&#8217;s office asking him to veto the bill due to its deficiencies. Here is a link to the new law.  Much easier to read than having to go back and forth between the orginal bill, the Substitute [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/03/23/landlords-omnibus-bill-signed-into-law-read-it-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Landlord&#8217;s Omnibus Bill &#8212; with Amendments &#8212; To Be Signed Into Law Today</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/03/20/landlords-omnibus-bill-with-many-revisions-to-be-signed-into-law-tomorrow/</link>
		<comments>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/03/20/landlords-omnibus-bill-with-many-revisions-to-be-signed-into-law-tomorrow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Act 143 (Landlord's Omnibus Law)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATCP 134]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental Agreements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental Documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlords' Omnibus Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Bil 466]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=3601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the biggest pieces of pro-Landlord legislation in quite some time was passed by the Wisconsin Senate and adopted by the Assembly recently and will be signed into law by Governor Walker today.  Unfortunately some of the pro-Landlord provisions were amended, diluted, or removed. I am certainly not denouncing this new law.  Many aspects of it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2012/03/20/landlords-omnibus-bill-with-many-revisions-to-be-signed-into-law-tomorrow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Bills Would Limit Tenant&#8217;s Attorney&#8217;s Fees When Suing Landlords</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2011/10/27/new-bills-would-limit-tenants-attorneys-fees-when-suing-landlords/</link>
		<comments>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2011/10/27/new-bills-would-limit-tenants-attorneys-fees-when-suing-landlords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ATCP 134]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney's Fees. ATCP 134]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord Violations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=3276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are two new proposed laws that if passed would limit the amount of attorney’s fees that could be awarded to a tenant that has sued his/her landlord for violation of ATCP 134 to 3 times the amount of compensatory damages in Wisconsin.  The proposed legislation (Special Session Assembly Bill 12 &#38; Special Session Senate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2011/10/27/new-bills-would-limit-tenants-attorneys-fees-when-suing-landlords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Consequences of A Landlord Violating Wisconsin&#8217;s Residential Rental Practices (ATCP 134)</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2011/04/28/the-consequences-of-a-landlord-violating-wisconsins-residential-rental-practices-atcp-134/</link>
		<comments>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2011/04/28/the-consequences-of-a-landlord-violating-wisconsins-residential-rental-practices-atcp-134/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ATCP 134]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Residential Rental Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tenant's Remedies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=2507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Residential Landlord Tenant relationship is controlled by two main areas of law: (1) Chapter 704 of the Wisconsin Statutes, and (2) the Wisconsin Administrative Code, Chapter ATCP 134 entitled &#8220;Residential Rental Practices.&#8221; ATCP 134 sets forth 21 regulations that a landlord must follow in a residential landlord tenant context.   ATCP 134, under its orginal [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2011/04/28/the-consequences-of-a-landlord-violating-wisconsins-residential-rental-practices-atcp-134/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Landlords Should Periodically Inspect Their Rental Property . . . or Risk $98,465 In Damage</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/11/15/landlords-should-periodically-inspect-their-rental-property-or-risk-98465-in-damage/</link>
		<comments>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/11/15/landlords-should-periodically-inspect-their-rental-property-or-risk-98465-in-damage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ATCP 134]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right of Entry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Covenant of Quiet Use and Enjoyment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspecting Rental Unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right To Entry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=2158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night I read an article about a Virginia landlord that had $98,465 in damage to one of his rental units.  Apparently his tenant was a compulsive hoarder and every room in the home was full from floor to ceiling with trash, soiled clothing, old newspaper, rotten food, and other deberis and excrement.  It cost the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/11/15/landlords-should-periodically-inspect-their-rental-property-or-risk-98465-in-damage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
