<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Landlords Should Not Play Games With Tenants&#8217; Security Deposits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/01/07/landlords-should-not-play-games-with-tenants-security-deposits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/01/07/landlords-should-not-play-games-with-tenants-security-deposits/</link>
	<description>Tristan&#039;s Landlord - Tenant Law Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/01/07/landlords-should-not-play-games-with-tenants-security-deposits/comment-page-1/#comment-1824</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=1059#comment-1824</guid>
		<description>Allie -- I cannot give legal advice via this blog as you pointed out.  To my knowledge there is no law, regulation of case in Wisconsin that defines what &quot;normal wear and tear&quot; is.  That determinination is left up to the judge or court commissioner based on the specific facts elicited at trial.  Specific facts would be needed to give you an opinion ---- how long did you live there, what caused the odor, if odor caused by a pet were pets allowed etc etc.  Regardless of the facts and even if I could give you advice on this questions a court could disagree with me.

Not much help, I realize, but the issue of what is &quot;normal wear and tear&quot; is always a crap shoot as it means different things to different judges and even different things to the same judge on different days.  It is a veritable &quot;black hole&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allie &#8212; I cannot give legal advice via this blog as you pointed out.  To my knowledge there is no law, regulation of case in Wisconsin that defines what &#8220;normal wear and tear&#8221; is.  That determinination is left up to the judge or court commissioner based on the specific facts elicited at trial.  Specific facts would be needed to give you an opinion &#8212;- how long did you live there, what caused the odor, if odor caused by a pet were pets allowed etc etc.  Regardless of the facts and even if I could give you advice on this questions a court could disagree with me.</p>
<p>Not much help, I realize, but the issue of what is &#8220;normal wear and tear&#8221; is always a crap shoot as it means different things to different judges and even different things to the same judge on different days.  It is a veritable &#8220;black hole&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allie</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/01/07/landlords-should-not-play-games-with-tenants-security-deposits/comment-page-1/#comment-1804</link>
		<dc:creator>Allie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=1059#comment-1804</guid>
		<description>Mr. Pettit,
I have an issue with my ex-landlord that I&#039;m confused about. I hope this doesn&#039;t count as specific legal advice, but is it considered &quot;normal wear-and-tear&quot; if there was an &quot;odor&quot; left on the mattress, comforter set, pillows, and curtains in the bedroom? They said they were forced to buy a new comforter set and pillows, and then deep clean the curtains and mattress. This &quot;odor&quot; wasn&#039;t explained with any specific description or even adjectives, and we never smoked in the house and had no pets so it couldn&#039;t be anything that breached the lease. Is &quot;odor&quot; without proven cause a matter of opinion or at least covered under &quot;normal wear-and-tear&quot; ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Pettit,<br />
I have an issue with my ex-landlord that I&#8217;m confused about. I hope this doesn&#8217;t count as specific legal advice, but is it considered &#8220;normal wear-and-tear&#8221; if there was an &#8220;odor&#8221; left on the mattress, comforter set, pillows, and curtains in the bedroom? They said they were forced to buy a new comforter set and pillows, and then deep clean the curtains and mattress. This &#8220;odor&#8221; wasn&#8217;t explained with any specific description or even adjectives, and we never smoked in the house and had no pets so it couldn&#8217;t be anything that breached the lease. Is &#8220;odor&#8221; without proven cause a matter of opinion or at least covered under &#8220;normal wear-and-tear&#8221; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R May</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/01/07/landlords-should-not-play-games-with-tenants-security-deposits/comment-page-1/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>R May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=1059#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>Mr. Finger&#039;s comment is the first comment, 1-8-2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Finger&#8217;s comment is the first comment, 1-8-2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R May</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/01/07/landlords-should-not-play-games-with-tenants-security-deposits/comment-page-1/#comment-1208</link>
		<dc:creator>R May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=1059#comment-1208</guid>
		<description>To Mr. Finger&#039;s comment, immediately below.  Mr. Finger, if you &quot;withheld every penny of it,&quot; you would end up in the same boiling pot of stew as Tschantz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Mr. Finger&#8217;s comment, immediately below.  Mr. Finger, if you &#8220;withheld every penny of it,&#8221; you would end up in the same boiling pot of stew as Tschantz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/01/07/landlords-should-not-play-games-with-tenants-security-deposits/comment-page-1/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan R. Pettit, Esq.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=1059#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>Merrie -- I cannot give legal advice via this blog.  I can tell you that if a tenant does not give a landlord proper notice to vacate (and the requirement to give the notice was legal) then the landlord has a duty to attempt to mitigate the tenant&#039;s damages by re-renting the unit.  If the landlord is able to re-rent the unit then the tenant would only be responsible for the costs of re-rental and any rent that was lost.  So if you re-rented quickly and now rent was lost then the old tenant may not be responsible for any rent.

Improper deductions from security deposit are the #2 most litigated area in landlord-tenant law (after evictions) so you want to have that carefully analyzed.

T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merrie &#8212; I cannot give legal advice via this blog.  I can tell you that if a tenant does not give a landlord proper notice to vacate (and the requirement to give the notice was legal) then the landlord has a duty to attempt to mitigate the tenant&#8217;s damages by re-renting the unit.  If the landlord is able to re-rent the unit then the tenant would only be responsible for the costs of re-rental and any rent that was lost.  So if you re-rented quickly and now rent was lost then the old tenant may not be responsible for any rent.</p>
<p>Improper deductions from security deposit are the #2 most litigated area in landlord-tenant law (after evictions) so you want to have that carefully analyzed.</p>
<p>T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merrie</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/01/07/landlords-should-not-play-games-with-tenants-security-deposits/comment-page-1/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>merrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=1059#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>what moderation is needed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what moderation is needed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merrie</title>
		<link>http://petriestocking.com/blog/2010/01/07/landlords-should-not-play-games-with-tenants-security-deposits/comment-page-1/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>merrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://petriestocking.com/blog/?p=1059#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>Tenant gave me 28 day notice to vacate on Feb. 23rd, tenant began moving out on Feb. 25th. Tenant called me to do a move-out inspection &amp; turned over keys on March 2nd
(7 days later)

 Because the tenant did not give me adequate notice are they responsible to pay March?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tenant gave me 28 day notice to vacate on Feb. 23rd, tenant began moving out on Feb. 25th. Tenant called me to do a move-out inspection &amp; turned over keys on March 2nd<br />
(7 days later)</p>
<p> Because the tenant did not give me adequate notice are they responsible to pay March?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

